Una Milicia bien regulada, estando necesaria a la seguridad de un Estado libre, el derecho del pueblo de tener y de portar Armas, no será infringido. This would leave an indication of any attachments that may have been "stripped" from the email message, but without breaking the signatures of remaining attachments in such cases.īust that 55+ EFF nightclub and do it right, folks, unless it's the youth wing spouting the exact same old fogies' party line. It would be preferable to digitally sign SHA hashes of the main message and all attachments in a single additional attachment. Currently, each attachment is signed separately and independently by the PGP-MIME standard. It would be nice to have an option to automatically include some of these headers in the body of the signed message when composing a signed email message. Only the body of the email is signed, not the envelope headers, namely the subject and intended recipients, and probably most importantly, the date. PGP signatures do have a couple of rather severe and vicious limitations. If not, please don't hesitate to ask me about it through a different communication platform. My outbound email is usually signed with my private key. having an option that just enables it by default for certain accounts would be really useful. Unfortunately the requirement to painstakingly enable sign-only for each outbound email makes me forget it sometimes. So signed emails definitely are useful for some things. How well that holds up in discussions with its recipients (or worse, in a court case) remains to be seen, but who knows, right.
So when one or more of my mail servers get hacked and used for illicit emails, I can plausibly deny responsibility for them, because they lack my signature. that's what I'm signing all my emails for at least. It is however great to be able to use PGP for additional authenticity. Most of my emails are signed only, because barely any of my correspondents use PGP.
0 kommentar(er)
